| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 |
161. Is Eve for bots? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Please do not confuse Multiboxers with Bots. They are no the same thing.
- by Jason Xado - at 2012.09.15 13:46:00
|
162. AFK Mining Exploit? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Jimmy Gunsmythe wrote: Quite understood, but if the program clones commands, it's not quite the same as the person manually doing the commands himself. If using ISBoxer is the same as not using it, then no one should have a problem with CCP p...
- by Jason Xado - at 2012.09.09 16:48:00
|
163. AFK Mining Exploit? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Vincent Athena wrote: CCP: Maybe ISBoxer command cloning needs to be added to the list of things that are "patterns of play that facilitate acquisition of items, currency, objects, character attributes, rank or status at an accelerated rate w...
- by Jason Xado - at 2012.09.05 21:24:00
|
164. AFK Mining Exploit? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Keep in mind that AFK missioning is an ISK faucet where as AFK mining is not.
- by Jason Xado - at 2012.09.05 19:38:00
|
165. Perhaps it is time for General Hull Maintenance Costs? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
When I first started playing this game I was a bit uncertain about the economy with no form of item durability. I thought how can an industrial minded player make an empire if people only have to buy a ship once and then it never goes away. Once I...
- by Jason Xado - at 2012.09.04 22:18:00
|
166. Eve's Death Knell - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
ISD Dorrim Barstorlode wrote: Abel Merkabah wrote: ISD Dorrim Barstorlode wrote: Jason Xado wrote: Abel Merkabah wrote: lol...didn't consider it...Eve is 9 years old now, so 11 would be 20...real simple...lol... I see. That make...
- by Jason Xado - at 2012.09.03 00:19:00
|
167. Eve's Death Knell - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Abel Merkabah wrote: lol...didn't consider it...Eve is 9 years old now, so 11 would be 20...real simple...lol... I see. That makes sense. I personally hope it lasts another couple hundred years. I plan on passing on my virtual corporate emp...
- by Jason Xado - at 2012.09.02 22:50:00
|
168. Eve's Death Knell - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Abel Merkabah wrote: I personally hope Eve goes on for at least another 11 years I'm curious. Why 11?
- by Jason Xado - at 2012.09.02 22:42:00
|
169. HOW TO KILL (most) MINING BOTS - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I do not like the idea. This would interfere with my ability to multibox, which is a valid and completely legal way to mine. Also it would be extremely emersion breaking. Also what most people think are bots are really just players multiboxing. ...
- by Jason Xado - at 2012.09.02 01:01:00
|
170. On multiple accounts and characters - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Narka Utama wrote: some form of botting Having multiple accounts does not equal botting. Multiboxing is a normal thing in EvE.
- by Jason Xado - at 2012.08.28 21:53:00
|
171. Is this what CCP intended...? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Xado Employee 57463-A1 wrote: Jason Xado wrote: Interesting names does not equal bot. Having multiple accounts require multiple names. It is easier to keep track of all your accounts if they have interesting names. I agree boss! Get ...
- by Jason Xado - at 2012.08.28 18:18:00
|
172. Is this what CCP intended...? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Alavaria Fera wrote: Jason Xado wrote: Katran Luftschreck wrote: Was it this guy ? Hey looky there, nice big screenshot with names right on it! Does that make CCP bloodhounds' job easier or what? Actually it is most likely a multiboxe...
- by Jason Xado - at 2012.08.28 17:55:00
|
173. Is this what CCP intended...? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Katran Luftschreck wrote: Was it this guy ? Hey looky there, nice big screenshot with names right on it! Does that make CCP bloodhounds' job easier or what? Yer welcome. Actually it is most likely a multiboxer and CCP is not interested...
- by Jason Xado - at 2012.08.28 11:00:00
|
174. Is this what CCP intended...? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Natsett Amuinn wrote: That was helpful, thank you. You are welcome. I'm just trying to spread the word that not everyone with more than two accounts is botting.
- by Jason Xado - at 2012.08.28 02:09:00
|
175. Is this what CCP intended...? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Natsett Amuinn wrote: Jason Xado wrote: Natsett Amuinn wrote: If all 10 ships warp into belt, move to separate locations in the belt, each target different rocks, and activate strips at the same time, he's botting. Or are you guys sayin...
- by Jason Xado - at 2012.08.27 23:50:00
|
176. Is this what CCP intended...? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Natsett Amuinn wrote: If all 10 ships warp into belt, move to separate locations in the belt, each target different rocks, and activate strips at the same time, he's botting. Or are you guys saying that there is software that lets 10 ships mo...
- by Jason Xado - at 2012.08.27 22:53:00
|
177. Is this what CCP intended...? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I use to think there were bots everywhere myself. Until I started multiboxing myself with IsBoxer. I learned that a lot of the behaviors I saw that I thought were botting were the same behaviors I was doing with Multiboxing with IsBoxer. I also di...
- by Jason Xado - at 2012.08.27 21:26:00
|
178. Is this what CCP intended...? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
James 315 wrote: Very likely to be botters, it takes awhile to get them banned... More likely multiboxing in my opinion.
- by Jason Xado - at 2012.08.27 14:35:00
|
179. Is this what CCP intended...? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Yes, working as intended. Multiboxing is allowed.
- by Jason Xado - at 2012.08.27 14:21:00
|
180. Everyone LOVES Oversized Guns - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t6CXAaI1OAo
- by Jason Xado - at 2012.08.22 00:54:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |